ACS Data Users Group

 View Only
  • 1.  Question about missing MOE

    Posted 03-08-2019 10:43 AM

    Hi,

    This is a pretty basic question but I can't seem to find a concise explanation online, and I'm pretty new to the ACS! I'm just looking up general data on the racial/ethnic make-up of Illinois and Illinois counties in 2016 (using 2012-2016 ACS 5-Year Estimates). For those who identify as Hispanic or Latino, many of the counties are missing MOE data and instead have five asterisks (*****). The explanation the ACS provides is: "An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate." Does this mean that the estimates the ACS provides in these cases are not valid/reliable? I'd like to calculate a coefficient of variation for these estimates but I can't do it without a margin of error. Any help would be greatly appreciated!



  • 2.  RE: Question about missing MOE

    Posted 03-08-2019 02:44 PM
    Hi Bill,
    The asterisks mean that this particular ACS estimate has been controlled to the Census Bureau's official population estimate for this racial/ethnic group. So there is no sampling error associated with the estimate. The Census Bureau's "Accuracy of the Data" document states the following:

    "If the margin of error is displayed as ‘*****’ (five asterisks), the estimate has been controlled to be equal to a fixed value and so it has no sampling error. A standard error of zero should be used for these controlled estimates when completing calculations, such as those in the following section."

    See: www2.census.gov/.../MultiyearACSAccuracyofData2016.pdf (Page 11)

    I hope this helps,
    -Mark


  • 3.  RE: Question about missing MOE

    Posted 03-11-2019 03:06 PM
    Thank you, Mark! This is extremely helpful.