Hi Beth Jarosz, Rebecca Tippett, and Dave Stinchcomb. Thanks for the helpful tips! Just adding a couple more thoughts and background here.
Dave Stinchcomb's mention of a conceptual model reminded me that, in the face of an exogenous shock like the current pandemic, any near-term forecasting I do is probably going to be a bit too “business as usual†no matter what. Given that, maybe today's best bet is a really simple and transparent estimate, coupled with strong caveats about the model/reality mismatch? Either way, it's a good reminder that I really should be learning more about what forecasters used to think would be driving change in this city over the next decade or so. The city's 2030 general plan is short on technical details, but I'm continuing to poke around.
My main concern, pre-pandemic, was in properly reflecting foreseeable gentrification. I’m not a domain expert, and have no sound idea of what the driving factors are, or have been, in the particular region in question (Richmond/San Pablo). Economically driven displacement, I would guess, is increasingly salient?
For what it's worth, my team has also been using Woods-and-Poole forecasting as implemented by EPA’s PopGrid tool. The base year for those forecasts is currently 2010, though (decennial block counts). It matches up fairly well at county scale vs ACS blockgroup-level estimates for 2013-2017, but I don’t know its reliability vs alternatives at city scale. It's part of the BenMAP package promulgated by EPA, so it's very defensible by citation, which, for a gov't agency, is meaningful.
Thank you all for the dense material to chew on! The Nature article is a bit over my head at the moment, but I'm happy to try and learn new terms of art.