Not to be flip here, but the stigma surrounding family and gender identities has a very long and unfortunate history, including in their statistical measurement, so it's important to keep focusing on the proper measurement instruments.
Back in the day, households were "headed" by men, so if a woman listed herself as "household head" in a survey, and there was a "male" household member, the coders changed the answer for tabulation. Back in the day, there were no "unmarried partners." Back in the day, there were no "same sex partners.
Except there were. See, for example, Dan Bouk's Democracy's Data chapter on "Partners."
Or as things began to change, the creation of the POSSLQ, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POSSLQ
Original Message:
Sent: 8/28/2025 3:37:00 PM
From: Meghan Maury
Subject: Great article on transgender data (and what we're losing now it's gone)
I really enjoyed this article on gender identity data, which highlights changes to the federal data ecosystem and the impacts those changes will have on data about transgender people: We've been tracking the number of Americans who identify as transgender - soon, there will be no reliable way to measure them
| The Conversation |
remove preview |
|
| We've been tracking the number of Americans who identify as transgender - soon, there will be no reliable way to measure them |
| The federal government has erased gender identity questions from federal surveys. Researchers say it will cost them at least a decade's worth of data. |
| View this on The Conversation > |
|
|
------------------------------
Meghan Maury
Maury Fox Consulting
------------------------------